At close, 27 Apr '25
0 verUSDCClaim
Events
Reading the line…
These totals are summed over all 8 share movements in this address’s history in the vault.
•The vault’s events record 228.69 verUSDC deposited across 4 mints and 229.08 verUSDC withdrawn across 4 burns, the
assets word of the ERC-4626 events.•This address holds no shares at block 52,871,740, so no claim is stated.
•The share ledger adds up to the wei: 222.02 Re7RWA minted, less what was burned, is the 0.00 Re7RWA the vault’s
balanceOf reports at that block.This address’s own events in the vault
8 rows at or below block 52,851,056 from Rails's store of chain readings, 0 rows above it read now; reconciled at block 52,871,740.
Every share transfer this address sent or received on this vault, newest first, replayed into the balance the vault itself reports. The replay gives 0 Re7RWA and balanceOf at block 52,871,740 gives 0, so the two agree and the rows below are drawn. Each row states its own share price, read at the block that row happened in; no line is drawn between two of them, because nothing was read between them.
Every share price below is convertToAssets(10^18), the 18 being this vault’s own decimals() — its asset’s 6 plus a DECIMALS_OFFSET() of 12. Both are reads at block 52,871,740, not a convention this page assumed.
replayed from this address's own transfers
8 events
Withdrew, 27 Apr 2025
107.57: 111.08 verUSDC to the wallet, 107.57 Re7RWA into the position
111.08V
107.57Withdrew
Empty: this address held no shares at block 29,490,559, so nothing is attributed to any market. The vault's allocation at that block is in the panel below.
Each band is a read at that row’s own block, and nothing is drawn between two of them. The vault’s asset moved between these blocks at the curator’s own reallocations, which are not rows here and are not read at all; the space between two rows is this timeline’s ordinary gap and says nothing. A segment is proportional and not a trace of anyone’s money: it is this address’s shares over the whole supply, applied to what the vault supplied in that market, so two addresses holding equal shares hold equal segments whatever either deposited or when.
8
Deposited, 26 Apr 2025: 90 verUSDC into the position, 87.16 Re7RWA to the wallet
87.16
V90
Deposited
Largest at this block: JTRSY, then Idle market.
7
Withdrew, 19 Apr 202577.52: 80 verUSDC to the wallet, 77.52 Re7RWA into the position
80V
77.52Withdrew
All of this address's verUSDC claim sat in JTRSY at this block.
6
Deposited, 25 Mar 2025: 25 verUSDC into the position, 24.3 Re7RWA to the wallet
24.3
V25
Deposited
Largest at this block: JTRSY, then Idle market.
5
Withdrew, 25 Mar 202524.3: 25 verUSDC to the wallet, 24.3 Re7RWA into the position
25V
24.3Withdrew
All of this address's verUSDC claim sat in JTRSY at this block.
4
Withdrew, 22 Mar 202512.64: 13 verUSDC to the wallet, 12.64 Re7RWA into the position
13V
12.64Withdrew
Largest at this block: JTRSY, then Idle market.
3
Deposited, 22 Mar 2025: 3.69 verUSDC into the position, 3.58 Re7RWA to the wallet
3.58
V3.69
Deposited
Largest at this block: JTRSY, then Idle market.
2
Deposited, 17 Mar 2025: 110 verUSDC into the position, 106.98 Re7RWA to the wallet
106.98
V110
Deposited
Largest at this block: JTRSY, then Idle market.
1
10%performance fee
The vault’s own accrual, and the curator’s reallocations, are rows nowhere here. A row is something this address did. What accrual did to the share price shows in each row’s own price figure, and nowhere else. A transaction that carried this address’s own leg very likely moved other shares too; only this address’s leg is stated.